they also calculated the number of won pledged national convention delegates on that basis. One in each of Iowa's four congressional districts, where the results from all in-state satellite caucuses will be reported and added up within each congressional district. There are less than 500 registered and active Democratic voters here. And the winner is… personne. Jeudi, l'avance de Buttigieg s'était réduite à un petit dixième (26,2% contre 26,1% pour Sanders), selon les chiffres sur 97% des bureaux. If the number of viable groups formed in the first round or final round exceeds the number of electable county convention delegates in the precinct, then the smallest viable group(s) are forced to realign until the number of viable groups no longer exceeds the number of delegates. [36], In late August 2019, the DNC ordered both the Iowa and the Nevada Democratic state parties to scrap their plans for "virtual caucuses" due to security concerns. Quelles mentions doivent apparaître sur les boîtes de masques chirurgicaux pour prouver leur conformité ? Deux jours après le caucus de l'Iowa, le tout premier vote de la primaire qui s'est déroulé lundi soir, les résultats officiels et définitifs ne sont toujours pas connus. “Also, remember, we’ve got 55 states and territories after this.”. [27][28], In all precinct caucuses that elect more than one county convention delegate, the presidential candidates must meet a viability threshold within the individual precinct in order to qualify as a viable candidate. Nous n'étions pas très connus, mais nous avions une idée : l'idée que, alors que Washington n'a jamais semblé aussi éloigné de notre quotidien, un maire de la classe moyenne du Midwest américain pourrait porter la voix du peuple américain jusqu'au Capitole et s'assurerait qu'elle soit entendue.». Buttigieg won voters with a college degree with 23%, while Sanders won among voters with a high school education or less with 30%. Gabbard and Bloomberg with 1.2%; Bennet with 0.4%; Patrick with 0.1%, Gabbard with 1.5%; Bloomberg with 1.2%; Bennet with 0.3%; Patrick with 0.0%, After reallocation of delegates from candidates estimated to not clear the viability threshold in each precinct, Data not yet released, but all other candidates each have <5%, If the contest came down to Biden and Sanders, Bloomberg and Delaney with 1%; Bennet and Patrick with 0%, Bloomberg with 2%; Bennet and Patrick with 0%; others with 2%, Re-allocating support to second choice for candidates receiving <15% of first choice votes, If only the four candidates listed were viable in the voters' caucus sites, If only the six candidates listed were viable in the voters' caucus sites, Bennet with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with 0%; other with <1%; "no one" with 0%, Delaney with 1%; Bennet and Patrick with 0%; Someone Else with 1%, Patrick with 0.2%; Bennet and Delaney with 0.0%; "Other/Please Specify" with 0.4%; "Don't Know/Refused" with 13%, If voters could choose only one of Biden, Buttigieg, Sanders or Warren, Delaney and Patrick with 1%; Bennet with 0%, If the field is narrowed to these top four candidates, Bloomberg with 1%; Bennet, Delaney, and Patrick with 0%, Bennet, Bloomberg and Delaney with 1%; Patrick with 0%, Delaney with 1%; Bennet and Patrick with 0%; someone else with 1%, Bennet and Bloomberg with 1%; Delaney and Patrick with 0%, If the only viable candidates to caucus for were the four listed in this poll, Booker with 4%, Bennet and Delaney with <1%, Patrick with 0%, Other with <1%, Booker with 3%; Bloomberg with 1%; Bennet, Castro, Delaney, Patrick and Williamson with 0%; someone else with 1%, Booker with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Delaney, Patrick and Williamson with 0%; someone else with 1%, Booker with 3%; Castro with 1%; Delaney, Bloomberg, Bennet, Williamson with 0%, Booker with 4%; Bloomberg with 2%; Bennet, Castro, Delaney, Patrick and Williamson with 0%; someone else with 2%, Bennet, Bloomberg, Booker, Bullock, Castro and Williamson with 1%; Delaney, Messam, Patrick and Sestak with 0%, Booker with 3%; Bloomberg with 2%; Bennet with 1%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Sestak and Williamson with 0%; none with 2%, Booker, Bullock, and Castro with 1%, Messam, Delaney, Bennet, Williamson, and Sestak with 0%, "Someone else" with 1%, Booker with 2%; Bullock and Castro with 1%; Bennet, Bloomberg, Delaney, and Williamson with <1%; Sestak with 0%, Castro with 1%; Bennet, Booker, Bullock, Delaney, O'Rourke and Ryan with 0%, Bennett, Booker, Bullock and Castro with 1%; Delaney, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%, Yang with 3%; Gabbard and Steyer with 2%; Delaney with 1%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Messam, Sestak and Williamson with 0%, As evidenced by Sestak being listed in second choices but not first preferences and the lack of an 'other' column in the first preferences topline, Steyer with 3%; Gabbard and Yang with 2%; Bennet with 1%; Bullock, Castro, Delaney, Ryan and Williamson with 0%; Messam and Sestak with no voters, Gabbard and Steyer with 3%; Yang with 1%; Delaney, Ryan and Williamson with 0%; Bennet, Bullock, Castro, Messam and Sestak with no voters; refused with 0%, Yang with 5%; Bullock with 4%; Gabbard and Steyer with 2%; Bennet and Williamson with 1%; Castro with 0%; Delaney, Messam, Ryan and Sestak with no voters; everyone else with 4%.